what happens when filmmakers give movies away?
DVD sales go up
After enormous hype, late last year MGM entered into a deal with Google, announcing they would be the first Hollywood studio to stream full-length films on YouTube. The buzz was effectively killed however, when only older titles from the movie archives were selected for the launch. This move prompted much criticism about why anyone would choose to watch such “clunkers” as Bulletproof Monk and The Magnificent Seven– on or offline.
Also in 2008, Paramount Pictures launched a Facebook app called VooZoo, allowing users to share clips from their favorite films and hopefully driving them toward DVD sales. The app received a scathing, hilarious (and in some respects innacurate) review by CrunchGear’s Nicholas Deleon, who warned users to stay away. It would seem we have, since the app has only 140 active users per month as of today–though in September Advertising Age reported that the app “has quickly exploded, adding 20,000 members a day, eventually becoming used by several hundred thousand Facebook users.”
In a similar approach to clip-sharing, Monty Python films clips are now being distributed on a branded YouTube channel–with impressive results: immediately after launch, sales of the DVD box-set shot upward, say officials at Google (owner of the video sharing site) as reported in The Guardian. The video clips were placed alongside clickthru adverts by retailers iTunes and Amazon.com, and sales of the classic film DVD set went through the roof, peaking at #2 on Amazon.
Likewise, when independent filmmaker Hunter Weeks elected to distribute his entire (feature-length) film on YouTube, it resulted in strong DVD sales, reports Home Media Magazine. This was in part because of the promotional efforts by YouTube and Amazon.com to support the film.
This (controversial) trend of content creators and artists benefiting from free online distribution of their copywrite-protected content has been examined (especially with regard to music and books) over at Techdirt.
In related news, more short bits of film were posted online (but not sold) by the 2009 Sundance Film Festival. They experimented with distributing free downloads of ten film shorts (in their entirety, not just clips) for a limited time only on iTunes. Post-event, the Festival used a branded YouTube channel to run filmmaking contests and as an archive of interviews and behind-the-scenes media coverage of the 2009 event.


Since Amazon’s Kindle electronic book reader is both expensive and perpetually out of stock (not to mention bulky and 




































































